Animal testing is a cruel and
un-ethnical because it is not needed in science today.
Attempting to duplicate human
diseases, and data derived from physiologically altered animals due to
unavoidable stress in the laboratory environment raises complications in the
interpretation of the results. Trapped, confined, and constantly under
stress, these animals are hardly in any mental state to produce accurate,
reliable results.
Documents have shown that “species differences in liver
detoxification capacity may explain why many drugs are safe in animals, despite
the fact that liver toxicity is the major
reason for drug relabeling and withdrawal in humans.” (FDA
conference study documents, May 24, 2001.)
A “synthetic combination of
chemicals that mimics a liver” has been developed by scientists and put to the test,
concluding that the “stand-in liver may be used to test drugs for metabolic
toxicity” among other things. (Animal Testing, Wiki)
Scientists
and engineers at Harvard's Wyss Institute have put their ideas and new technology together, creating small
devices that contain human cells that mimic human organs. These include:
The chips can be used—instead of animals in in vitro disease research, drug testing, and toxicity testing. 3-D bioprinters have also been used to create human cells for in vitro testing.” If put into worldwide use, these tiny devices will solve many of the problems posed from testing on animals as well as the ethnicity of doing so. These "organs-on-a-chip" have been tested and proven to:
- Provide an accurate alternative to animal tests that often fail to predict human responses
- Test the effects of new drug candidates for safety and efficacy in human tissues
- Test the safety of cosmetics
- Test the toxicity of chemicals
- Help scientists elucidate how tissues respond to new drug candidates
- Ensure more accurate conclusions from the results
No comments:
Post a Comment